English · Español
European Sovereignty Monitor is a monthly record of what changed in Europe's technological, industrial and defence sovereignty, and which way each change pushed Europe's dependence on suppliers, systems and law it does not control.
Why this exists
European technology sovereignty is argued about constantly and recorded almost nowhere in one place. Search for a publication that collects it and you find the Commission's own pages, a few think tanks, some conference videos. Nothing that reads the Official Journal, the Council register and the procurement notices in the same pass and tells you what actually moved. This publication is that aggregation.
It is written for people who need to understand what European sovereignty means across technology, industry and politics, rather than for specialists who already track it.
What it covers
Policy and law, compute and infrastructure, defence and space, and industry, investment and R&D. Legislation moving through Council working parties and Parliament committees. Public money entering the compute stack, and where it lands. Procurement that goes to a European supplier and procurement that does not. The programmes deciding who supplies Europe a decade from now.
Four questions, not one
Sovereignty is not a single property, which is why two products launched in the same week can both be called sovereign and mean opposite things. This publication separates four questions: who owns it, who operates it, whose law governs it, and who made the parts. Most European instruments test the first three and stop before the fourth. Reading them apart is most of the work.
How claims are handled
Every claim is checked at a primary document where one exists: the Official Journal, the Council's public register, the Commission's own releases, company reporting. Where only trade press exists, the item says so in the text rather than in a footnote. Figures are not repeated from press summaries when the underlying document is available. An approved document is not a verified one, and an asking figure is not a clearing figure.
Corrections run in the next issue with the original claim quoted, never edited silently.
The publication covers instruments, programmes and market structure. It does not report private financings in motion, including ones already named in the press. That rule is fixed and it does not move issue to issue.
The datasets behind it
Two open datasets sit underneath the newsletter and are updated alongside it.
The European Tech Sovereignty Stack map carries 57 nodes covering Europe's technology stack from silicon to market, each scored on jurisdiction and dependency, each with a public source.
The EU Sovereignty Ledger follows public money across funder, instrument, recipient, supplier and jurisdiction of profit, and records the 42 places where the trail stops in public. A sourced zero is a finding, and it renders differently from an unknown.
Both are open data. A correction with a primary source attached will be applied and credited.
Languages
Published in English and Spanish, with Italian, German and French to follow. The sources are identical across every edition. Only the language changes.
Who writes it
Reidar Balstad, independently. The publication takes no funding from any party it covers.
Corrections and tips
Corrections, missing items and disagreements are all welcome, particularly with a primary source attached. Reply to any issue.