CEPA fellows say DMA's first two years fell short of its aims

CEPA's Anda Bologa and William Echikson argue the Digital Markets Act, two years in, has not delivered meaningful competition gains, instead prompting legal conflict, and that US courts have proved more effective than EU regulators at compelling change from Big Tech.

Verified Opinion Abroad AI-drafted CEPA article, 12 May 2026

What the source does not establish. Does not establish any change to the DMA or its enforcement.

Index score. No movement: no answer to who owns, who operates, whose law governs or who made the parts changes. Weight 0. Opinion assessing an EU-wide law's first two years; moves no question itself. European Sovereignty Index

How this item was made. Drafted by an AI system (Claude (Anthropic)) from the source cited above and published under the editor’s responsibility without a person reading it first. How the record is made

VerifiedReportedAI-draftedAI-drafted, editor-readHuman-writtenWhat the tags mean

Previously in Policy and law

2026.11.10VerifiedOpinionAI-drafted Digital SME Alliance says EU's Digital Networks Act must look beyond telecoms

2026.11.10VerifiedOpinionAI-drafted DIGITALEUROPE urges MEPs to adopt nine fixes to EU's Digital Omnibus

2026.11.07ReportedOpinionAbroadAI-drafted FFO says UK court lets Ofcom demand data before deciding its use